Chapter 01 / 16
Art, Attention and Education
Original source pages: 1–5 · English version
‘The purpose of art is to wash the dust of daily life off our souls.’
— Pablo Picasso
Picasso is not talking about art as ‘beautiful things on a wall’. He is talking about its function. About why we need it at all.
Daily life accumulates fatigue. Routine. Noise. Irritation. Small compromises. This is the ‘dust’. It does not kill us, but it slowly dulls our senses. We begin to live on autopilot.
Art works like water.
Music, a painting, a film, the taste of a dish, even a well-told story — suddenly something clicks inside. You feel again. Look more closely. Breathe more deeply.
There is a deeper meaning here.
1. Art is not a luxury.
It is not an ornament to life, but hygiene for the soul. Like washing your hands, only on the inside.
2. It does not have to be ‘understandable’.
Its task is not to explain, but to cleanse. Sometimes through delight. Sometimes through pain. Sometimes through silence.
3. It is about returning you to yourself.
Not becoming ‘better’. Becoming alive again.
Put this into the language of food.
Good food is art too.
It does more than satisfy hunger. It can restore memories, slow down time and remind you that you are a person, not a function between meetings. Bad food feeds the body. Good food washes dust from the soul.
1. Art as an ‘antidote to autopilot’
Much of life passes in functional mode.
Wake up. Get things done. Reply. Decide. Rush on.
The problem is not the workload. The problem is that sensitivity wears away. We stop noticing nuances. And without nuances, life becomes as flat as a reheated ready meal.
Art interrupts this mode.
A painting makes you stop. Music makes you slow down. A flavour makes you listen. A good text makes you think beyond the instructions.
This is what ‘washing away the dust’ means.
A return from ‘using’ to ‘experiencing’.
2. Why Picasso speaks of dust, rather than dirt
Dust is an important word. Dirt suggests something extreme.
Dust appears by itself. Quietly. Imperceptibly. Even in a clean house.
The same happens to the soul.
Nobody plans to become cynical, tired or indifferent. It is a side effect of ordinary life without pauses.
Art does not heal trauma.
It keeps us from becoming hardened.
Gastronomy is not alongside this. It is part of it
To be honest, gastronomy is one of the most powerful arts, because:
• it works with the body, memory and emotions at the same time;
• it cannot be ‘consumed in the background’ — bad food can, good food cannot;
• it requires presence in the here and now.
A real dish says: ‘Stop. Feel. Do not hurry.’
This is not about ingredients.
It is about attuned attention.
Like music played live and the same tune coming from a loudspeaker in a shopping centre. Formally, they are the same. In essence, they are different worlds.
Education as art — and this is where it gets most interesting
Good education does the same thing as art:
• restores a taste for thinking;
• teaches us to see connections, rather than instructions;
• clears away the templates of ‘that is how it is done’.
Bad education is dust squared.
It adds layer after layer: terminology, tests, regulations. A soul in a spacesuit.
A real teacher is not a transmitter of knowledge.
A real teacher is someone who washes the dust from thinking.
And the main, less obvious conclusion
Art does not make life more comfortable.
It makes life more sensitive.
And sensitivity is a dangerous thing.
Yet without it, everything else loses its flavour.
Like food without salt.
Like a conversation without pauses.
Like a life without ‘why’.
Andrei Gritskov’s educational philosophy
‘Education as clearing the mind’
The purpose of education is to wash the dust of habits, templates and false certainty from a person’s thinking.
Not to fill.
Not to train through drills.
Not to certify. To clear.
What I clear from thinking
Not ignorance. This matters.
I work with people who often have too much knowledge. But that knowledge:
• has become outdated,
• is disconnected,
• has turned into dogma,
• prevents them from seeing reality.
My audience includes:
• chefs who have ‘always done it that way’;
• managers who use the right words without substance;
• teachers who are tired of their own teaching manuals.
I do not add information for them.
I remove the coating.
Just as a good chef first cleans an ingredient and only then cooks it.
The key principle: slow down, rather than speed up
Most educational systems do one thing:
speed up the consumption of knowledge.
I do the opposite.
I create a pause.
A moment when a person suddenly realises: ‘Wait. Why do I think this in the first place?’
That is rare. And that is precisely why it is valuable.
My educational approach is not a stream.
It is a stop.
Like a tasting, rather than a buffet.
The teacher’s role in this model
In this model, the teacher is not:
• an expert looking down from above,
• a motivator,
• ‘the holder of the right answer’.
The teacher is a catalyst for attention.
Someone who:
• asks uncomfortable questions;
• breaks down false clarity;
• is not afraid of silence in the classroom.
This is closer to being a sommelier of thought than a lecturer.
Mistakes as an essential tool
In my philosophy, a mistake is not a system failure.
A mistake is a moment of clearing.
When someone makes a mistake consciously, examines it and feels no shame:
• illusions fall away,
• real understanding emerges,
• respect for the process returns.
I teach people not to ‘do it right’, but to see why something is wrong.
As in gastronomy: you ruined a sauce — excellent. Now you understand where the boundary lies.
Why art and food matter in my work
Because they:
• bring the body back into thinking;
• do not tolerate falseness;
• reveal the result immediately.
I teach people not to ‘know’, but to feel the difference.
The difference between:
• a genuine taste and an imitation;
• a thought and a quotation;
• experience and an account of experience.
This is education for adults, not for reporting purposes.
The ethics of my educational position
Here is the central point.
I do not promise comfort.
I promise:
• clarity,
• honesty,
• a renewed taste for one’s profession and for life.
A short manifesto
I work in education not to provide answers. I create conditions in which false answers disappear.
Education is not the accumulation of knowledge.
It is clearing the dust of habit from thinking.
My task is to restore a person’s sensitivity, because without it neither professional work nor life has any flavour.
Education as clearing the mind
We live in an age of excessive knowledge.
There are many courses. Even more experts.
And ever less clarity. I increasingly meet intelligent, experienced adults who know too much and yet see poorly. Not because they are stupid. Because, over time, thinking becomes covered in dust. Dust is dangerous.
It does not frighten us.
It accumulates quietly.
Habits. Templates. Professional overconfidence. Words that we repeat automatically and stopped testing against reality long ago. This is how automatic behaviour develops.
It is convenient.
It saves effort.
And it slowly kills sensitivity.
We begin to confuse experience with repetition.
Decisions with reactions.
Knowledge with understanding.
And at some point I always ask the same question: why does an adult need education at all?
Not to learn yet more.
And not for diplomas.
There is already enough of that today.
Real education does something else.
It washes the dust from thinking. Like art. Like good food. Like an honest conversation that leaves you uncomfortable — and clear. It does not accelerate. It slows things down.
It creates a pause in which a person suddenly hears themselves.
Why do I think this way?
Is this my decision or a familiar script?
Am I seeing reality or recognising a familiar shape?
I do not work with a lack of knowledge.
I work with its excess.
My task is not to give the right answers.
My task is to remove what is unnecessary. To create a space where people can doubt without weakness, make mistakes without shame and honestly acknowledge that their old certainty no longer works. I do not promise comfort. I promise clarity.
And clarity is rarely gentle.
In gastronomy, this is understood without theory.
Bad food simply feeds us.
Good food restores taste. To the body. To memory. To life.
Education is the same.
You can fill a person with knowledge.
Or you can restore their sensitivity — to their profession, to their decisions, to themselves. Knowledge ages quickly. Methods age even faster.
The ability to see nuances hardly ages at all.
That is why I do not teach people to know. I teach them to see.
And if, after learning, a person leaves with more precise questions rather than ready-made answers, the work has been done.
The dust has been washed away. Responsibility begins from there.